Navigating MEN R US in 60 seconds
Finding your way around MEN R US in 60 secondsNavigating the website in 60 seconds | 2019 Back to top
MORE is a selection of policy and strategy documents, research, and big thinking that’s caught our eye. We’ve indexed them using website’s six main sections (YOU, MEN, BODY, SEX, STI, and DRUGS) though and some of the documents fall under multiple headings.
Please let us know here if you think we should add something. In the meantime, if you’d rather watch than read, here’s our 2018 Antidote to the Xmas TV ad, and 2018 Pride video.
Made on the budget but made with love!
Be with Me | GMHC Antidote to the Xmas TV Ad | 2018
Back to top
90 Seconds of Your Life | GMHC Pride Video | 2018
How British moral attitudes have changed in the last 30 years
This analysis by the Policy Institute at King’s College London, based on polling by Ipsos MORI reveals how the British public’s views on moral issues have become increasingly liberal over the last 30 years, with society today far more tolerant of illegal drug use, homosexuality, abortion, depictions of violence and many aspects of sex in popular culture, and many other issues and activities. However, views on some behaviours haven’t changed or have even hardened, including on extra-marital affairs and rejection of capital punishment. The 1989 survey was published in the book We British, by Eric Jacobs and Sir Robert Worcester.
The wordings of the statements have been kept consistent to ensure comparable trends, even where concepts and language have moved on. Most of the 2019 survey results here have been conducted using the same design as the original study: face to face interviews in respondents’ own homes, to be representative of the whole population aged 15 and above. Two of the 2019 questions were asked on an online study, of a representative sample of the population aged 16 75: these comparisons should therefore be seen as indicative but still useful, given the very large changes in attitudes seen.How British moral attitudes have changed in the last 30 years | King’s College London
How British moral attitudes have changed in the last 30 years | King’s College London | PDF Booklet Back to top
Human Rights Campaign (US)
HRC advocates for LGBTQ equality and educates the public about LGBTQ issues.
The HRC Foundation improves the lives of LGBTQ people by working to increase understanding and encourage the adoption of LGBTQ-inclusive policies and practices.
Actress Sally Field speaks at HRC’s 16th Annual National Dinner and explains why she loves and supports her gay son Sam Greisman:
Human Rights Campaign | US
Sally Field receives HRC’s ally for equality award | Human Rights Campaign | 7 Oct 2012 | 14m 52s
Back to top
London Assembly: Supporting mental health for all
Report states: prevalence of mental ill-health is significantly higher in LGBT+ communities, disabled people, Deaf people, and those with experience of the criminal justice system. And the issue is compounded by services that do not understand and meet their specific needs.
LGBT+ is mentiomned on pages 5, 7 (recommendation 2), 11, 13, 16, 21, 22, 24, 31, 34, 38, 40, 42, 43, 45, 47.Supporting mental health for all | London Assembly | Jan 2018 Back to top
Culture for All Londoners
Alongside the Mayor’s other strategies and plans, this draft Culture Strategy (March 2018) outlines an ambitious programme to sustain a city that works hard, and plays hard, for everyone. A city that is built on the principle of culture for all Londoners. It is themed around four priorities:
- Love London – more people experiencing and creating culture on their doorstep
- Culture and Good Growth – supporting, saving and sustaining cultural places and spaces
- Creative Londoners – investing in a diverse creative workforce for the future
- World City – maintaining a global powerhouse in a post-Brexit world
LGBT+ is mentioned on pages 17, 43, 51, 75, 77, 141, 171.Culture for all Londoners | Mayor of London Back to top
LGBT Action Plan 2018
LGBT Action Plan resulting following the 2017 Government national survey of LGBT people – open to anyone who identified as having a minority sexual orientation, gender identity or had variations in sex characteristics. It asked questions about people’s experiences of living in the UK and in accessing public services. We asked questions about education, healthcare, personal safety and employment. The survey received more than 108,000 responses, making it the largest national survey of its kind anywhere in the world. The LGBT Action Plan contains 75 actions for this term of Parliament crossing all Government departments.
However one sees this as a step in the right direction, it hasn’t escaped our notice (at MEN R US) that the Action Plan has been launched while the Government is still shagging the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) … one of the most anti-LGBT organisations in the country and consistent in its objections to LGBT rights. For example, while the Action Plan is unequivocal in wanting to ban gay conversion therapy, it’s something DUP members have publicly advocated for in the past.LGBT Action Plan 2018 | Government Equalities Office | 4 Jul 2018
LGBT Action Plan 2018 (Launch Event) | Government Equalities Office | 4 Jul 2018
Government’s ‘inadequate’ LGBT action plan under fire from Labour’s Dawn Butler and campaigners | PinkNews | 3 July 2018 LGBT equality plan: ‘I panic when she reaches for my hand’ | BBC News | 3 July 2018 Back to top
National LGBT Survey 2017
The Government Equalities Office launched a national LGBT survey in July 2017 to develop a better understanding of the lived experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people, and people who identify as having any other minority sexual orientation or gender identity, or as intersex.
The survey was open for 12 weeks and received 108,100 valid responses through an anonymous online questionnaire that collected the experiences and views of individuals who self-identified as having a minority sexual orientation or gender identity, or as intersex, and were aged 16 or above and living in the UK.
- LGBT respondents are less satisfied with their life than the general UK population (rating satisfaction 6.5 on average out of 10 compared with 7.7). Trans respondents had particularly low scores (around 5.4 out of 10).
- More than two thirds of LGBT respondents said they avoid holding hands with a same-sex partner for fear of a negative reaction from others.
- At least two in five respondents had experienced an incident because they were LGBT, such as verbal harassment or physical violence, in the 12 months preceding the survey. However, more than nine in ten of the most serious incidents went unreported, often because respondents thought ‘it happens all the time’.
2% of respondents had undergone conversion or reparative therapy in an attempt to ‘cure’ them of being LGBT, and a further 5% had been offered it.
- 24% of respondents had accessed mental health services in the 12 months preceding the survey.
Hate crime England and Wales, 2015-2016
Information on the number of hate crimes from police recorded data in England and Wales from April 2015 to March 2016. The bulletin covers the extent and trends in hate crime for all forces, with additional analysis based upon more detailed data supplied by 24 police forces on the types of offences associated with hate crime. Hate crime is defined as ‘any criminal offence which is perceived, by the victim or any other person, to be motivated by hostility or prejudice towards someone based on a personal characteristic.’
There are five centrally monitored strands of hate crime: race or ethnicity, religion or beliefs, sexual orientation, disability, and transgender identity.
The publication includes information on racist incidents in England and Wales recorded by the police from April 2015 to March 2016. A ‘racist incident’ is any incident, including any crime, which is perceived by the victim or any other person to be motivated by a hostility or prejudice based on a person’s race or perceived race. This release includes an Annex on racially and religiously aggravated offences around the European Union (EU) referendum.
- Hate crime, England and Wales, 2015 to 2016
- Hate crime, England and Wales, 2015 to 2016: data tables
- Hate crime, England and Wales, 2015 to 2016: appendix tables
Hate crime report | GALOP
This research shows that our journey toward LGBT+ equality is far from over. Despite most people in this UK poll voicing support for LGBT+ people, a significant proportion still think we are dangerous, immoral or that we can be ‘cured’. More importantly, it offers a sobering reminder that progress achieved in recent decades can easily be reversed. Young people polled tended to hold more negative views toward LGBT+ people than other age groups. This alarming finding warns of a generational pivot ahead and a bumpy road for those of us committed to challenging anti-LGBT+ violence and abuse.
In this study, a representative sample of 1,617 people from across the UK answered questions on their beliefs about LGBT+ people. The key findings are:
- More than 4 in 5 people said that LGBT+ people should be free to live as they wish. 1 in 20 said that LGBT+ people should not have this freedom
- 1 in 5 people said being LGBT+ was ‘immoral or against their beliefs’. This rose to 1 in 4 among 18-24 year olds, higher than other age groups
- 1 in 10 people thought that LGBT+ people were ‘dangerous’ to other people
- 1 in 10 people said that being LGBT+ could be ‘cured’
- Around 3 in 5 people responded very positively about having LGBT+ people as neighbours. 1 in 5 people showed reluctance to the idea of LGB+ neighbours, and more than 1 in 4 to trans neighbours
- 3 in 5 respondents said that they were comfortable with trans people using the public restrooms that they use
- 5 in 10 people agreed that hate crime has higher impact than other types of crime, and that LGBT+ people modify their behaviour in public to avoid being targeted. However, only 4 in 10 thought that violence against LGBT+ people is a problem in the UK.
This report presents evidence about the needs and priorities of LGBT communities in relation to hate crime. It includes analysis of an on-line community survey of 467 LGBT people, which asked about experiences of hate crime and interactions with services. It also analyses interviews and written submissions from 18 individuals who have either experienced hate crime, or are professionals working on this issue. Despite progress on this issue, the results presented here suggest that homophobia, biphobia and transphobia remain a significant part of LGBT peoples’ lives. Additionally, it found that individuals face considerable barriers to accessing assistance in terms of policy, practice and legislation.
Experiences of hate crime
- 4 in 5 LGBT people had experienced hate crime
- A quarter had experienced violent hate crime
- A third experienced on-line hate crime
- A tenth experienced sexual violence as part of a hate crime
National LGB&T Partnership
The National LGB&T (lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans) Partnership, a member of the Department of Health, NHS England, and Public Health England’s Health and Care Voluntary Sector Strategic Partner Programme, is an England-wide group of LGB&T voluntary and community service delivery organisations that are committed to reducing health inequalities and challenging homophobia, biphobia and transphobia within public services.
The National LGB&T Partnership members positively influence the policy, practice and actions of Government and statutory bodies and ensure that health inequalities experienced by LGB&T people are kept high on the Government’s agenda and that best use is made of the experience and expertise found within the LGB&T voluntary and community sector.Reducing health inequalities and improving access to health and social care for LGB&T people | National LGB&T Partnership Lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans health priorities | National LGB&T Partnership
Building an LGB&T voice into planning systems Out Loud: LGBT voices in health and social care National LGB&T Partnership
Insights into designing and providing care and support the meets the needs of LGBT people Back to top
Public Health England action plan 2015-16
Public Health England’s evidence and action plan to address the health and well-being inequalities affecting gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men:
- Promoting the health and well-being of gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men: action plan (2015-16)
- Black and minority ethnic men who have sex with men: project evaluation and systematic review (May 2016)
- Promoting the health and well-being of gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men: initial findings
- Promoting the health and well-being of gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men: summary document
Substance misuse services for men who have sex with men involved in chemsex
Briefing for commissioners and providers of drug and alcohol services highlights issues relating to men who have sexual contact with other men (MSM)a involved in chemsex. It contains background information, recent data, prompts for local areas and services, and case studies.Substance misuse services for men who have sex with men involved in chemsex | Public Health England | Nov 2015 Back to top
Nothng here yet but we are looking.Back to top
LGBT+ sex and lifestyles survey
Earlier this year, GMHC (of which MEN R US is part) promoted this piece of research for Public Health Institute, John Moores University and the preliminary findings are now in.
Facebook sponsored advertising was used to recruit LGBT+ people to take part in an online survey. Four adverts were used over 6 weeks (one MSM, one WSW, one trans, and one LGBT+ advert). Relevant LGBT+ organisations also advertised the survey on their social media accounts. A prize draw for a £50 Amazon voucher, or one of two runner-up prizes of £25 was used. The questionnaire was divided into three sections: demographics, sexual health and drug use, and psychological well-being.
A total of 4,690 participants started the survey, of which 1,110 did not complete the survey sufficiently to be included in analyses (n=3,676, completion rate of 78%). The median time taken to complete the survey was 12 minutes.
Preliminary findings from the LGBT+ sex and lifestyles survey
Men who have sex with men
When controlling for other factors, MSM who engaged in chemsex were more likely to live in a densely populated area (56% vs. 32%), have a larger number of condomless anal intercourse male partners, be living with HIV (20% vs. 6%), and have a low sexual self-efficacy (confidence in practicing safer sex consistently). MSM engaging in chemsex were more likely to report currently taking PrEP (30%), compared to MSM engaging in other sexualised drug use (9%), and those not engaging in any sexualised drug use (3%).
Matthew Hibbert | Sexual Health Bulletin, Autumn 2018, issue 59, pg 4-8 | Public Health Institute, John Moores University Back to top
Sigma Research is a social research group specialising in the behavioural and policy aspects of HIV and sexual health. It also undertakes research and development work on aspects of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) health and well-being. While this section concentrates on the Gay Men’s Sex Survey (1993-to date), Sigma’s research covers a wide range of issues affecting gay men and you are encouraged to explore their website.
Gay Men’s Sex Survey
In 1993, Sigma Research carried out an on-the-spot survey of men attending the London Lesbian and Gay Pride festival, instigating an annual survey that has grown to be the largest in the world and an institution on the UK summer gay scene. The National Gay Men’s Sex Survey (GMSS), also known as Vital Statistics, has occurred 17 times in the 24 years since and now recruits exclusively online.
The content of the survey is developed in collaboration with health promoters, within the framework of Making it Count. The questions cover a range of demographics, health indicators, sexual behaviours, HIV prevention needs, use of settings in which health promotion can occur and recognition of national interventions. The weight given to each area varies each year, and the data collected is treated as cumulative, building a detailed picture of gay men and bisexual men and HIV over time.Sigma Research | Sigma Research
State of play: findings from the England Gay Men’s Sex Survey 2014 | Sigma Research
Final Reports: Gay Men’s Sex Survey | Sigma Research Back to top
Future of HIV services in England
Undertaken by the King’s Fund, this research aimed to make recommendations to those responsible at local and national levels for planning and delivering HIV services on how best to develop those services over the next 5–10 years. It included a review of existing literature and data, and interviews with national stakeholders. We then looked in detail at four geographical areas as case studies of how HIV services currently operate and the issues they face. This included finding out about patients’ experiences, through focus groups and interviews with people living with HIV. We held five focus groups and interviewed around 100 individuals, including direct input from 38 people living with HIV. Through the project’s advisory group and membership of our research team, we involved people living with HIV in all aspects of the study. We selected case study areas to give a diverse range of settings, including urban and rural areas, areas with high and low HIV prevalence, and a wide geographical spread (north and south of the country, and London).The Future of HIV Services in England | The King’s Fund | 2017 Back to top
Drugs and Alcohol Today: Chemsex Edition
A message from the guest editor of this special “Chemsex” edition of Drugs and Alcohol Today | Marcus Day
“Despite a growing number of deaths by overdose or rising incidence of HIV, the wider gay community largely ignored the contribution that illicit drugs, largely synthetic stimulants consumed orally, intranasally or anally but rarely injected, had to morbidity and mortality in their community.
Harm reduction was originally focussed on the prevention of HIV and other blood borne diseases acquired through injecting drug use. The focus of interventions was street based and focussed on people who injected opioids. Despite there being LBGT people represented in harm reduction, there was a prevailing culture of heteronormativity that was a barrier to accessing services for some.
Two challenges needed to be overcome in applying a harm reduction lens to chemsex. First, chemsex is largely a non-injecting drug scene and the World Health Organisation has yet to enunciate the HIV risks associated with non-injecting stimulant use. Second has been the denial and stigmatisation of men participating in chemsex by their gay peers. The first made men who were using drugs through non-injecting routes invisible, while the second created a barrier to accessing services, either with gay men’s health services that often has a palatable aversion to drug use, or traditional heteronormative harm reduction services.
Finding no appropriate services that addressed a growing epidemic of death and disease, chemsex activists took example from the 1980s AIDS epidemic and the community response that addressed a need ignored by the medical and political establishments. The result: a community spurred on to action reminiscent of the actions of the early pre-ART days of the “AIDS crises”.”
Chemsex experiences narratives of pleasure | Maitena Milhet, Jalpa Shah, Tim Madesclaire, and Laurent Gaissad
“The purpose of this paper is to understand the dynamics of pleasure related to chemsex from the perspective of French gay men and other men who have sex with men (MSM). Recognising that participants in chemsex are social actors, the authors diverge from the prominent “pathology paradigm” used in public health.
In-depth interviews were conducted with gay men and other MSM engaging in chemsex via snowball sampling (n=33). The authors explored the definitions of pleasure and the role of stimulants, sexual activity, smartphones and partners in chemsex pleasures.
Chemsex pleasures encompass multiple dimensions that go far beyond bodily pleasures, such as love or romantic relationships, socializing with significant others and sexual discovery through disinhibition. Narratives of pleasure were also, simultaneously, stories of suffering and distress. This dissonance can pose challenges to the participants in chemsex, their entourages and care providers.”
Chemsex origins of the word, a history of the phenomenon and a respect to the culture | David Stuart
“The purpose of this paper is to clarify the origins, use and meaning of the term “chemsex”.
The term chemsex has a definition and a purpose that promotes culturally competent care for a marginalized group of vulnerable people. This is a qualitative, personal, point-of-view piece which may be of value in broadening understandings and responses amongst public health and academic activities.
The findings can be used to develop a sense of community and support amongst men who have sex with men in a chemsex setting, and to provide some background and context for professionals working in this field.”
The problematic chemsex journey a resource for prevention and harm reduction | Tom Platteau, Roger Pebody, Nia Dunbar, Tim Lebacq, and Ben Collins
“Chemsex is a phenomenon that has gained increasing attention in recent years. The purpose of this paper is to differentiate chemsex from other sexualized substance use, and clarify differences between recreational and problematic chemsex use. Despite plentiful publications, little has been published on underlying determinants that predispose individuals to chemsex, and their process toward problematic chemsex use.
During the second European Chemsex Forum, people who engage in chemsex, community organizers, researchers, clinicians, therapists, social workers and (peer) counselors discussed potential pathways to problematic chemsex. In this manuscript, we translate findings from these discussions into a framework to understand the initiation and process toward problematic chemsex.
Six stages (loneliness and emptiness, search for connection, sexual connection, chemsex connection, problematic chemsex and severe health impact) and a set of factors facilitating the transition from one stage to the next have been identified.”
The problematic chemsex journey a resource for prevention and harm reduction | Tom Platteau, Roger Pebody, Nia Dunbar, Tim Lebacq, and Ben Collins | Drugs and Alcohol Today/ Emerald Insight | Apr 2019
The psychological roots of chemsex and how understanding the full picture can help us create meaningful support | Katie Evans
“The purpose of this paper is to explore the larger picture of chemsex in a hope to understand how to best work with clients therapeutically. The paper’s aim is to acknowledge not just the risk and “negative” aspects but also what might be gained by men engaging in chems use. How can the chemsex space act as a container for emotions and experiences?
This is a paper based upon cases from within the author’s private practice plus anonymous interviews with men. It comes from a sex positive therapy approach and explores ideas formed within the author’s work as a practitioner.
The findings within this paper showed just how complex an issue chemsex is with many layers to it. The author also found that the most important aspect to bear in mind is that this is a very human issue, with aspects many can relate to such as intimacy, self-esteem, desire for connection and dealing with difficult emotions. By seeing what part it plays in the life of men involved then it is possible to can understand how seductive it could be.”
Too painful to think about chemsex and trauma | Stephen Morris
“Whilst chemsex is a relatively new phenomenon, trauma is not. Freud borrowed the word from physical medicine, where it was used to describe tissue damage, and applied it, for the first time, as a metaphor to a psychological process by which the protective functioning of the mind can too be pierced and wounded by events. The chemsex environment hosts a myriad of potentially traumatising scenarios and experiences, though perhaps disguised as exhilaration or excitement. The paper aims to discuss these issues.
These experiences piled on top of childhood experiences of being “less than” for being gay, can be responsible for widespread undiagnosed post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among those who engage in chemsex. This paper explores this possibility and offers solutions.”
What is sober sex and how to achieve it | Remziye Kunelaki
“The purpose of this paper is to provide the first definition of sober sex and recommendations for health care professionals who work therapeutically with patients who struggle with intimacy after experiencing chemsex. The recommendations are based on the clinical experience of a psychosexual therapist working with men having sex with men (MSM) in a Sexual Health clinic in central London. The paper concludes that having a clear definition of sober sex and specific tools, such as healthy masturbation exercise, could prove helpful for health professionals who work with this cohort of patients.”
Yes, has no meaning if you can’t say no consent and crime in the chemsex context | Stephen Morris
“The title of this paper is a statement made by a man at the end of his treatment following conviction for several sexual offences. It is powerful in conveying a simple and accurate meaning of consent. Legally, consent is not complicated and can be simply defined as: permission for something to happen or agreement to do something. The context of consent, however, is complicated and complex none more so than when it becomes an issue within chemsex. If we are to gain a full appreciation of consent-related complexity, we must also gain an understanding of the wider picture concerning chemsex and crime. The purpose of this paper is to provide that wider picture. With the exception of breaching of drug-related law, not all men who engage in chemsex are committing offences but, as we are discovering, a not insignificant percentage are and this needs to be cause for concern.”
Yes, has no meaning if you can’t say no consent and crime in the chemsex context | Stephen Morris | Drugs and Alcohol Today/ Emerald Insight | Apr 2019Back to top
Chemsex: support for LGBT families and friends
Resource providing helpful information for the families, friends and LGBT partners of people engaged in chemsex. Supporting a loved one whose chemsex involvement you are concerned about can be difficult and may put a lot of practical, financial and emotional pressures on family members, friends and partners. This resource will help you with how to support yourself and your loved one and provides practical and emotional advice and information on services that are available. The resource is aimed both at people who are familiar with chemsex as well as those to whom it is a new concept.Chemsex: More than just sex and drugs | Adfam | London Friend Back to top
Global State of Harm Reduction
The 2018 Global State of Harm Reduction is the 6th edition of this report, and the most comprehensive ever thanks to a coordinated effort of over 100 harm reduction practitioners, academics, advocates and activists from around the world. It finds that, since the last report in 2016, the global harm reduction response has effectively stalled (view press release here). Overdose, HIV and hepatitis C crises continue, among myriad health and social problems related to drug use and drug policy, yet many countries are neglecting them.
Chemsex is mentioned on page 69.Global State of Harm Reduction 2018
Global State of Harm Reduction 2016 Harm Reduction International (HRI) Back to top
Drug Strategy 2017
The word ‘chemsex’ is mentioned four times in a short paragraph, part a 52-page strategy document:
“Chemsex is a term for the use of drugs before or during planned sexual activity to sustain, enhance, disinhibit or facilitate the experience. Chemsex commonly involves crystal methamphetamine, GHB/GBL and mephedrone, and sometimes injecting these drugs (also known as slamming). Chemsex carries serious physical and mental health risks including the spread of blood-borne infections and viruses. PHE will support local areas to meet these needs by promoting and publishing guidance on effective practice, including targeted interventions and close collaboration between sexual health services and other relevant services including community groups.”
Some argue the fact that the harms of chemsex are mentioned at all is a win, and while Public Health England has done work on the issue, it just seems like small change against the turmoil of recent years including research last year (2016) reporting a 119% increase in deaths associated with GHB/GBL in London with most linked to chemsex. That’s about 1 gay man dying every 12 days in the capital.
It’s disappointing there’s no mention of gay men and men who have sex with men, or a wider LGBT focus, at all. This was included in the 2010 Strategy (with a note that treatment services should consider the needs of LGBT groups). The importance of services speaking directly to specific communities is widely recognised, particularly when addressing problematic chemsex drug use, discussing sexual behaviour openly and addressing the multiple stigmas that accompany drug use, HIV, gay sex and sexual identity. Bottom line: we at MEN R US think the strategy is a missed opportunity though the short paragraph does provide some opportunity to refer back to the strategy when pushing for better services for chemsex users.2017 Drug Strategy | Home Office | July 2017
Response to the 2017 Drug Strategy by the English Harm Reduction Group
The Government has now published the 2017 Drug Strategy. We express great concern at the lack of focus on harm reduction – an evidence-based response that protects people and ultimately saves lives – at a time when drug-related deaths are the highest on record.
- Heroin and morphine deaths rose by 109 percent in the England and Wales between 2012 and 2016ii, when the evidence is overwhelming that harm reduction initiatives can reduce them. Initiatives such as opioid substitution treatment (OST) and needle and syringe programmes are only mentioned fleetingly within the Strategy, and others such as drug consumption rooms and heroin assisted therapy (HAT) are completely absent.
- It is appalling that the Government acknowledges in the strategy that the rise in drug-related deaths is ‘dramatic and tragic’, but proposes no concrete action plan to reduce them. For example, the strategy comments on the importance of naloxone to prevent overdose deaths but proposes no national systematic approach to naloxone provision, nor any new funding for this vital intervention. It is shocking that whilst drug-related deaths have outstripped both road traffic fatalitiesiii and deaths from blood borne virusesiv,v, there is no coordinated response from central government.
- This erosion of services continues against a backdrop of funding for all drug services being continuously reduced. Public health spending has reduced by more than 5% since 2013vi, and according to analysis a further £22 million in cuts are to made for drug treatment by the end of 2017/18vii. Without funding drug services will not be able to function effectively.
- The Government has dismissed decriminalisation of drug possession offences as being simplistic. Yet the World Health Organisation and a multitude of United Nations agencies have called for the end of criminal sanctions for possession and use of drugs in recognition that criminalisation creates barriers to those needing treatment and increases health harms.
People who use drugs are often vulnerable and marginalised. This new Drug Strategy simply does not begin to support them and reduce drug-related deaths. We call on the Government to implement the recommendations of the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs to tackle opiate related deaths, these include: optimal OST prescribing; easier access to naloxone; a national HAT programme; and that drug consumption rooms are implemented where there is needviii. The Government must also ensure a minimum level of care by requiring local authorities to provide drug treatment and harm reduction services by law.
Signatories: Professor David Nutt, Drug Science; Niamh Eastwood, Release; Deborah Gold, National AIDS Trust; John Jolly, Blenheim CDP; Fionnuala Murphy, Harm Reduction International; Kate Halliday, SMMGP; Jamie Bridge, International Drug Policy Consortium; Chris Ford, IDHDP
Response to the 2017 Drug Strategy | English Harm Reduction GroupChemsex drugs and former legal highs targeted by Home Office | The Guardian | 14 Jul 2017
Don’t believe the hype: the new drugs strategy ignores the LGBT Community | Vice | 28 Jul 2017
Back to top
Drug misuse 2013-14
Examines the extent and trends in illicit drug use among a nationally representative sample of 16 to 59 year olds resident in households in England and Wales, and is based on results from the 2013/14 Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW).
Covers the following topics: extent and trends in illicit drug use among adults, including separate analysis of young adults (16 to 24 year olds); frequency of illicit drug use in the last year; illicit drug use by personal, household and area characteristics and lifestyle factors; and estimates of illicit drug use by ethnicity and sexual orientation.
Prepared by staff in Home Office Statistics under the National Statistics Code of Practice and can be downloaded from both the UK Statistics Authority website and the Home Office pages of the GOV.UK website:Drug misuse: findings from the 2013 to 2014 CSEW | GOV.,UK website Back to top
European Chemsex Forum
Address key chemsex issues including sexual health and sexual pleasure; harm reduction and risk-taking; shame, crime, personal safety, peer support and online support. Feature a wide range of emerging structured, community-based local responses from both higher capacity and lower capacity locales. Focus attention on key under-represented populations including migrants, sex workers, trans and non-binary people. Focus attention on key regions, including Eastern Europe, Central Asia and the Middle East and North Africa. Screen Micheal Rice’s documentary, parTy boi: black diamonds in ice castles, followed by a session on marginalisation. Have improved simultaneous translation with most sessions into French, Russian and English.3rd European ChemSex Forum 2019 | NAM aidsmap
European Chemsex Forum | RESHAPE/ IHP
2nd European Chemsex Forum, Berlin, 22-24 March 2018
The 2nd European Chemsex Forum called for concrete actions at the local level to provide strategic resources to chemsex responders. The aim of the Forum was to develop a platform to engage in international, cross-sector, multi-disciplinary dialogue around chemsex-defined by the use of specific drugs (“chems”) in a sexual context … and facilitate coordinated responses to chemsex issues in locales where chemsex related harm is a problem, regardless of its size and impact.The chemsex challenge | Drug Policy Network SEE | 27 Mar 2018 Loneliness and community are key to chemsex | NAM aidsmap | 2 Apr 2018
The chemsex response is reshaping sexual health services and reinventing harm reduction | NAM aidsmap | Apr 2018
Non-consensual sex is a recurrent problem in the chemsex environment | NAM aidsmap | 9 Apr 2018
European Chemsex Forum, London, 6-8 April 2016
The European ChemSex Forum was a preliminary intelligence gathering and networking event aiming to provide a platform to engage in international, cross-sector, multi-disciplinary dialogue and discussions around ChemSex – defined by the use of specific drugs (“Chems”) in a sexual context by Men who have Sex with Men (MSM), Transgender people and any other population disproportionately affected by HIV, hepatitis C and other sexually transmitted infections. The Forum was hosted by 56 Dean Street, GMFA, ReShape, International HIV Partnerships (IHP) and Professional Briefings, with the support of Gilead, ViiV Healthcare, Abbvie and AIDES and endorsed by the European AIDS Treatment Group, HIV in Europe and AIDS Action Europe. This meeting report synthesises and summarises the proceedings and outcomes of the European ChemSex Forum and has been prepared by the organising committee in consultation with key partners.Report | European Chemsex Forum 2016 Report | European Chemsex Forum 2016 Back to top
Out of your mind
‘Out of your mind’ is a report by London Friend examining how drug and alcohol treatment services can be improved for lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans (LGBT) people. The report aims to encourage commissioners and providers of drug and alcohol treatment services to be more mindful of the support needs of LGBT people when planning and delivering services.
Higher levels of both drug and alcohol use have been reported within LGBT populations, although these groups report being less likely to engage in traditional substance misuse services, citing lack of understanding of the substance use and cultural needs amongst the barriers. ‘Out of your mind’ investigates ways in which this imbalance might be addressed, ensuring that LGBT people have access to high quality, responsive, and inclusive treatment and support services.Out of your mind: full report | London Friend | May 2014
Out of your mind: executive summary | London Friend | May 2014 Back to top
NEPTUNE has been developed to improve clinical practice in the management of harms resulting from the use of club drugs and novel psychoactive substances. It is aimed at clinicians working in a range of frontline settings, including drug treatment and recovery services, emergency departments, sexual health services, primary care and mental health services.Neptune | Novel Psychoactive Treatment UK Network Guidance on the clinical management of acute and chronic harms of club drugs and novel psychoactive substances | Neptune | 2015
Club drug use among lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans (LGBT) people | Neptune | 2016 Back to top
Part of the Picture
The Part of the Picture (POTP) research project was a five-year partnership between The Lesbian & Gay Foundation (LGF) and the University of Central Lancashire (UCLan), funded by the Big Lottery Fund’s research programme between 2009-2014. POTP had three main aims:
- The establishment of an England-wide database of lesbian, gay and bisexual (LGB) people’s drug and alcohol use
- The use of the database to directly inform local and national policy and practice in addressing the drug and alcohol use of LGB people
- An improved knowledge and understanding of the needs of LGB drug and alcohol users amongst drug and alcohol agencies, through dissemination of the research findings
The study found evidence of significant problematic substance use among the LGB community:
- Across all age groups LGB people are much more likely to use drugs than the general population
- Problematic patterns of drinking are much more common among LGB people
- LGB people demonstrate a higher likelihood of being substance dependent and show high levels of substance dependency
- Those scoring as substance dependent are more likely to seek help, although from informal sources rather than specialist services
- A third of respondents who scored as substance dependent would not seek information, advice or treatment, even if they were worried about their drug or alcohol use
- LGB people may be more vulnerable to developing dependent and problematic relationships with drugs and alcohol
- Significant barriers exist to seeking information, advice or help among LGB people
A suite of reports present the study’s findings and detail the methodology and sample. Briefing sheet (downloads) set out recommendations for commissioners and policy makers, GPs, drug and alcohol service providers, researchers, and the LGBT voluntary and community sector to tackle this significant public health issue.Part of the Picture: LGB people’s drug and alcohol use in England | LGF/ UCLan Back to top